Charity, not Welfare
Are we going about helping our neighbors all wrong?
Does sending our money hundreds of miles away with the promise that some of it will return to meet the needs in our communities make sense? How can we be sure the money that does make it back will be earmarked for our problems, and not those in an elder statesman's district?
People have talked at length about what it would be like if we could just end welfare, but that is a fool's errand. The political needed to even begin to think about that is nearly insurmountable today.
So what if we do it backwards? What if we can create a more attractive alternative? Would it be possible to make private charity the preferred method of dealing with the unexpected? Can we restore the safety net to its original intent; catching the victims of life's misfortunes just long enough to get them back on their feet?
We think the answer is a resounding "YES!" and we've got a few things in mind to do just that. It won't happen next month, or even next year—but if you can be patient, we have a few things in mind that will warrant your attention.
Wanting to help is laudable. Many feel called to prevent and alleviate the suffering of others. It's important though to remember that the spirit of charity comes from within. Demanding the sacrifice of time and money from others without them first having the will to participate causes anger and resentment.
Lead the way. Show everyone how to be a good neighbor—a giving neighbor. Join us in our effort to reclaim the mantle of responsibility for the least among us from our legislators. They can't promise to “help” if we're already doing it.
Our plan is to contact you no more than once a week while we get started. If you ever think it's too much, let us know before you unsubscribe.
We are not storing your email on our site. We are using MailChimp for our list management and will never provide your email to other businesses or interests.